View Full Version : Next weeks delisting POLL
Courtesy of the lovely David!
All these "Celebs" are up for delisting next week. It's either ALL of them, or NONE :shock:
Should they all go or should they all be kept on the list??
Alex Parks
Alicia Douvall
Alistair Griffin
Ann Widdecombe
Anthea Turner
Billy Connelly
Carrie Anne Moss
Christopher Lee
Cindy Crawford
Claudia Winkleman
Colin Paterson
Craig Phillips
David Dickinson
Diane Modahl
Goldie
Jack Ryder
Jamie Lee Curtis
James Gooding
Javine Hylton
Jennie Bond
Jennifer Saunders
Jonny Lee Miller
Julia Volkova
Julianne Moore
Leilani Dowding
Lena Katina
Lisa Scott Lee
Louis Walsh
Macy Gray
Mark Owen
Mark Rhodes
Max Beesley
Mike Read
Neil Hamilton
Neil Ruddock
Peter Kay
Queen Latifah
Sam Fox
Sam Nixon
Scott Mills
Sinead Quinn
Tommy Lee Jones
Indie
31-03-2004, 01:41 PM
some should be kept, some should go.
Originally posted by Indie
some should be kept, some should go.
Yeah thats what I reckon!
But it's an all or nothing vote this week! :shock:
Last Splash
31-03-2004, 02:56 PM
DAFT vote as most of us seem to think that some should stay and some should go?
Indie
31-03-2004, 03:35 PM
Originally posted by Star
Yeah thats what I reckon!
But it's an all or nothing vote this week! :shock:
if it's all or nothing, probably nothing.
Agnetha
31-03-2004, 06:13 PM
I say scrap them all... Some are worth keeping, but there's SO much shit in there....
David
01-04-2004, 04:50 AM
I say scrap too... they can always bring a few back at a later date
To be honest I think there's only one or two worth keeping and anyone who'll cry over losing them is just a LOSER!
Last Splash
01-04-2004, 12:27 PM
Originally posted by David
I say scrap too... they can always bring a few back at a later date
To be honest I think there's only one or two worth keeping and anyone who'll cry over losing them is just a LOSER!
But surely it defeats the object to delist em all and then say bring one or 2 back in 2 months time when it is decided they shouldn't have been delisted in the first place?
David
01-04-2004, 01:46 PM
Originally posted by Last Splash
But surely it defeats the object to delist em all and then say bring one or 2 back in 2 months time when it is decided they shouldn't have been delisted in the first place?
Well to me it's just an issue of natural wastage, they delisted Ulrika once, so what, the game evolves and there should be some degree of evolution...
You just fear change because you're old!
Earl Purple
01-04-2004, 02:42 PM
Better in my opinion the more celebs there are, even if some of them never perform.
1. It stops people setting up accounts for every listed celeb.
2. You never know when someone will suddenly break into the news, and it takes too long to list them back.
David
05-04-2004, 07:44 AM
Well it looks like they're all getting delisted!
Take that you moaning gits!
Last Splash
05-04-2004, 08:35 AM
Originally posted by David
Well to me it's just an issue of natural wastage, they delisted Ulrika once, so what, the game evolves and there should be some degree of evolution...
You just fear change because you're old!
So explain the 7-5 vote on here in favour of NOT getting rid of them?:manson:
David
05-04-2004, 09:00 AM
Originally posted by Last Splash
So explain the 7-5 vote on here in favour of NOT getting rid of them?:manson:
Explain the 84-16 vote on the website in favour of getting rid of them! The opinions of twelve people here are HARDLY indicative of the Celebdaq community as a whole now ARE THEY?:manson:
Last Splash
05-04-2004, 12:58 PM
Originally posted by David
Explain the 84-16 vote on the website in favour of getting rid of them! The opinions of twelve people here are HARDLY indicative of the Celebdaq community as a whole now ARE THEY?:manson:
No, but YOU dismissed my views as wrongjust because I am ancient, I was saying that you cant do the same about the other 6 people on here.
And I expected the vote to go for getting rid of em, cos most people on there, will not look beyond their own noses. Those same people that vote to delist will be the same people moaning where Peter Kay is the next time he's in corrie.
lolly
05-04-2004, 01:04 PM
I say get rid of the lot. There are a few there I have reservations about, but mostly the list is people who don't get sufficient coverage to warrant being there.
I see what Andy says about Peter Kay, but he's hardly going to be a huge story, is he?
And as David says, anyone can be relisted at any time anway.
David
05-04-2004, 02:00 PM
I fail to see why every single newsworthy celeb needs to be on there anyways...
Earl Purple
05-04-2004, 03:08 PM
yeah it would be easier if there were just say 12 celebs total. Much easier then to manage our multiple accounts.
Last Splash
05-04-2004, 04:14 PM
Originally posted by David
I fail to see why every single newsworthy celeb needs to be on there anyways...
I agree, and some of them are not even that newsworthy!
Originally posted by Last Splash
No, but YOU dismissed my views as wrongjust because I am ancient, I was saying that you cant do the same about the other 6 people on here.
And I expected the vote to go for getting rid of em, cos most people on there, will not look beyond their own noses. Those same people that vote to delist will be the same people moaning where Peter Kay is the next time he's in corrie.
GIBBERISH
Agnetha
23-04-2004, 12:09 AM
They were removed then despite Fatherandys highbrow attempt to remove...
Peter Kay's removal was BAFFLING seeing as he'd barely been on the site a couple of months and had actually RISEN, unlike CERTAIN stocks Celebdaq in their 'wisdom' chose...
Last Splash
23-04-2004, 08:25 AM
Originally posted by Sild!
Peter Kay's removal was BAFFLING seeing as he'd barely been on the site a couple of months and had actually RISEN, unlike CERTAIN stocks Celebdaq in their 'wisdom' chose...
This was my point!
Well hopefully he will be relisted pretty soonish.
Agnetha
23-04-2004, 08:51 AM
Who gives a flying PENGUINS CUNT?
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.3 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.