I always saw you as the Dannii to Star's Sharon.
Hi Pete Waterman here!
choo-choo-choose me!
Moopy blogs & Moopy tweets
Stephen Gately - A beautiful man who is now the perfect angel. Forever young and never forgotten. R.I.P
I think Lolly quitting should be ADDED to the TITLE. This is HISTORICAL NEWS for Moopy.
In all honesty it HAS been a while coming. And although I when I did stand down as admin I never had any plan to stand down as mod as well, it did dawn on me pretty soon after that I felt my time was up, for quite a few reasons. When I realised that, I thought I'd just see this term out.
oh lolly
I might have to take your place as moopy's dad/Star's right hand gay. Unless Donna Winter is interested.
Wait, Su's TWENTY?
(Or am I just being dim?)
He actually might be. I have no idea.
Actually he can't be. He can't be old enough to be lying about his age though...
I liked Suomi's CV
Definitely going to check him out on LinkedIn
Also as a long-time Slave supporter, VOTE SLAVE
FEARLESS FEMALE
Suomi's CV was all SMOKE and MIRRORS.
barack osama found my Facebook. I think I should be terrified, but I also think this would be an optimal time to invite him back to put himself forward for modship given he's a SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSMAN and all.
I fully support a Slave re-election campaign as well, a funky return would be superb as well
I'm sensing a LACK of SUPPORT.
I need to get my OH ELEVEN BITCHES on this and I can start playing dirty.
(Suomi grooms spastic children and Slave thinks Hollyoaks is just great - Not who you want running Moopy)
Sadly he's taken down his rather OBVIOUS profile picture of a golliwog since he sent me a message and there's now no information on show other than his name, so it's a bit boringNONETHELESS I shall inform him that there's a vacancy and that he's of course a glittering candidate
![]()
We need the moderator team to come out and rate each other. That's always a lark.
An Ag-Slave-Su ticket would get my vote
No need for MUD SLINGING BOYS
It's not the GAY WAY
FEARLESS FEMALE
ALSO
I'm going lay down the rules before we get into the voting stage, just so it's crystal clear.
In some years we've been a bit flexible if someone was defeated by one or two votes. This will NOT be happening this time, the number of moderators is set and if you lose, you snooze.
There will, however, be a BY-ELECTION system available for mid-year candidates if one of the moderating team drops out/dies/gets sacked
I think it should be compulsory for each of the mods to say a line or two about the impression they get of their fellow mods performance.
Well maybe I'd be around more if I hadn't been so universally rejected on three occasions
I didn't think, I just posted
Penny tweets under his real name, doesn't he?
Nothing to see here MOVE ALONG.
Are you calling me OLD? Vote for me and keep me off the streets/from holding you up in the newsagent while I pay for my three-month backlog of Daily Mail deliveries with two pence pieces while mithering on to myself about the weather and the number of coloureds in the neighbourhood
Last edited by Donna Winter; 08-06-2011 at 11:44 AM.
And oh...
Oh HOW MANY YEARS
Is it NOW Maurice?
Last edited by Penelope; 08-06-2011 at 12:33 PM.
I was planning to do this anyhow - but it's going to be of no use unless there's something genuinely RELEVANT to say. You could just end up with 7-8 variants on "works well as part of the team, pulls his/her weight", therefore I was more tempted to point out the people that really stood out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)