Britney's Indefinite Work Hiatus: The Instagram Years

Rita

User
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
36,298
I was thinking what if she IS actually mentally not quite all there anymore and her family are just simply trying to protect her like Amanda Bynes parents were at one point? Has she been assessed recently? I really hope not but it is not uncommon for someone with mental difficulties to turn on those closest to them who are simply trying to protect them?
 

POP!

Running on stardust
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
44,816
I was thinking what if she IS actually mentally not quite all there anymore and her family are just simply trying to protect her like Amanda Bynes parents were at one point? Has she been assessed recently? I really hope not but it is not uncommon for someone with mental difficulties to turn on those closest to them who are simply trying to protect them?
I had this same thought. But it’s becoming increasingly clear that the conservatorship was instituted on either false pretenses at worst or rushed without any actual procedural integrity at best. Ronan farrow’s NYT piece is very chilling. The conservatorship was basically petitioned and granted while she was locked up in a hospital and attempting to consult with her own attorney. The family member who gave corroborating testimony for Jamie back then has come forward as deeply regretting it.

They have changed the narrative from dementia to “undue influence” but there can’t be any reason a conservatorship should be in place for that over her person… obviously her finances/estate are a different matter. But still, I think she’s demonstrated she is fully capable to function as an adult for the past 13 years with multiple tours/residencies/promo campaigns. The fact that the court has determined she is capable of consenting on her own to contract her own attorney is a big step as that will be used to show her capacity.
 

lolly

Rowena? From Kuwait?
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
158,613
I was thinking what if she IS actually mentally not quite all there anymore and her family are just simply trying to protect her like Amanda Bynes parents were at one point? Has she been assessed recently? I really hope not but it is not uncommon for someone with mental difficulties to turn on those closest to them who are simply trying to protect them?
I mean WHO REALLY KNOWS, but I guess it's likely she still needs some kind of support isn't it? Just almost certain that the people who are supposed to be doing that very much aren't.
 

Rita

User
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
36,298
Have her family spent her fortune? She is still worth around 50 million or something but it is not really a lot for Britney when Christina and others are easily worth double.
 

Tetris-Rock

one of those "they/thems"
Joined
May 24, 2006
Messages
12,360
Location
London
I was thinking what if she IS actually mentally not quite all there anymore and her family are just simply trying to protect her like Amanda Bynes parents were at one point? Has she been assessed recently? I really hope not but it is not uncommon for someone with mental difficulties to turn on those closest to them who are simply trying to protect them?
I wouldn’t expect anyone in the conditions they have placed her under in to be mentally well. She was already struggling with mental health issues before and her family’s behaviour has traumatised her all over again.

And even if she has mental health needs, nothing justifies the level of control that her family and their team have over her. She is a grown adult and should be allowed to make decisions as to who should have control over her estate in situations where she isn’t in the position to make decisions.

Lest we forget that that same team are in control of what goes out on her accounts. It is in their interest that people start to doubt Britney’s capacity. If being a bit messy on the internet was the criterion for conservatorship then everyone here would be under one!
 

Rita

User
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
36,298
I wouldn’t expect anyone in the conditions they have placed her under in to be mentally well. She was already struggling with mental health issues before and her family’s behaviour has traumatised her all over again.

And even if she has mental health needs, nothing justifies the level of control that her family and their team have over her. She is a grown adult and should be allowed to make decisions as to who should have control over her estate in situations where she isn’t in the position to make decisions.

Lest we forget that that same team are in control of what goes out on her accounts. It is in their interest that people start to doubt Britney’s capacity. If being a bit messy on the internet was the criterion for conservatorship then everyone here would be under one!

I 100 percent agree with you, and was just thinking out loud really. I was just thinking to myself today about the Amanda Bynes saga with her parents when she called her father a paedophile whilst having a psychotic episode. The fact that Britneys family haven't responded speaks volumes though.
 

Suedey

secret.
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
59,309
Can't Madonna adopt her or something? Except then she'll ruin ice cream with Cher by insisting on non-dairy fro-yo I guess and will make it all about her.
 
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
4,952
Location
North Persia
I mean WHO REALLY KNOWS, but I guess it's likely she still needs some kind of support isn't it? Just almost certain that the people who are supposed to be doing that very much aren't.
I think everyone needs some support from time to time and personally speaking there were plenty of times my family disagreed with my own choices or thought of them as either under the influence of someone else or not well thought out. Would that give them the right in any legal system to put me under a conservatorship? I doubt it.
 
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
4,952
Location
North Persia
I hope the tits out narrative isn't used to frame her as crazy. My friends have their tits out in tiny shorts all over their Instagram too, come rain or shine :rolleyes:
I've thought about this too, but even if it does it tells a lot about how do we as a public read upon this, cause clearly it was perfectly OK for Madonna to do it a hundred years ago.
 
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
1,540
For the first time, Britney's best friend Cade Hudson is speaking out on Britney's situation.

He posted on Instagram: "I’ve kept my mouth shut for 12 + years on Britney. Enough is enough. After getting thousands of death threats, getting water bottles thrown at my head in bars from by standers telling me I’m brainwashing her -Britney lm now speaking up."

He opened up about 2007, saying: "Britney who was accused of some errors as a new mom at 26 with 100 cameras in her face daily waiting to document any wrong move she did gets placed under a never ending conservatorship?"

To that he says ... "***ism at its best."

He goes on: "This is a violation of someone’s basic human rights that were taken away. I’ve kept my mouth shut out of the fear of losing my job as her agent and losing the career I worked my *** off for 15 years to build, out of threats from the man we we all know who, but I won’t even dignify mentioning his name. I’m officially done being quiet."

He says he knows the real Britney: the one who's spent Xmas with him, who's volunteered at dance classes for underprivileged kids, and adds ... "The system and the public failed her. Her new attorney is the best of the best and knows that the work has just begun but it’s progress & hope and that’s all we can ask for for now until action can be taken."

He concludes: "I’ll end with a few things, one person who was in her life (again legally can’t name names) was also silenced by the people around her. You silencers know who you are. This person has her best interest at heart."

And finally, "Even if people don’t see it now, it will come out. To the ones who should be worried, you know who you are too. The nonsense needs to end, and the healing process needs to begin. The lord tends to pay those people back in his own ways. So for the first time I’m publicly saying #FREEBRITNEY."

"Time to get my girl and best friend back" and caps it off with a plea to his old pal, writing ... "@Britneyspears it’s your time - the world is listening and is on your side. The world NEEDS you freed and back."

Source: Cade's instagram and TMZ article stating what he said


91114427_216156069594475_801618794847880

EoQ8LJtXIAQ8RRq.jpg

Apparently he's SPEAKING OUT in Netflix's exposé of the Spears family too :o
 

Diddy

Rice Queen
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
58,029
Location
Osaka, Land of Fire
Can someone post the Britney drowning gif that somehow doesn’t seem to exist on GIFPHY? Say something funny like “Ten Minutes!!”
 
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
1,540

Britney Spears’ Personal Conservator Fights Back After Jamie Spears Alleges Singer Is ‘Mentally Sick’ and Needs Psychiatric Hold​




Jamie Spears says that Britney Spears’ personal conservator, Jodi Montgomery, told him that his daughter is “mentally sick” and wanted to place her under a 5150 psychiatric hold.

Now, in a statement obtained by Variety, Montgomery is pushing back on Mr. Spears claims — and, once again, asking him to step down from his daughter’s conservatorship.

“Ms. Montgomery implores Mr. Spears to stop the attacks,” Montgomery’s statement says, in part. “It does no good; it only does harm. We all need to focus on one thing, and one thing only — the health, well-being and best interests of Britney Spears.”

Spears’ father is the conservator of her estate, managing all financial decisions, while Montgomery is the singer’s conservator of her person, managing all personal and medical decisions.

In new court documents, filed on Friday morning with the Los Angeles Superior Court, Spears’ father alleged that Montgomery called him last month to say that she is concerned about his daughter’s behavior and mental health and believes she might need to be placed under a 5150 psychiatric hold.

“On July 9, 2021, I received a phone call from Ms. Montgomery,” Mr. Spears says in the docs. “During our call, Ms. Montgomery sounded very distraught and expressed how concerned she was about my daughter’s recent behavior and overall mental health. Ms. Montgomery explained that my daughter was not timely or properly taking her medications, was not listening to the recommendations of her medical team and refused to even see some of her doctors.”

Spears’ father says that Montgomery asked for his help in addressing these issues, as she was “very worried” about the “direction my daughter was heading in.”

In response, an attorney for Montgomery, Laurieann Wright, tells Variety: “Ms. Montgomery does have concerns about Ms. Spears’ ‘recent behavior and overall mental health,’ as set forth in Jamie Spears’ Declaration dated August 6, 2021. Due to medical privacy, Ms. Montgomery cannot go into those concerns with any further detail except to say that having her father Jamie Spears continuing to serve as her Conservator instead of a neutral professional fiduciary is having a serious impact on Ms. Spears’ mental health.”

“Notably, Jamie Spears has yet to resign as Ms. Spears’ Conservator of the Person, which is why Ms. Montgomery continues to serve as Temporary Conservator of the Person,” the statement continues. “It is in Ms. Spears’ best interests that her father step down as her Conservator, so he can go back to just being Ms. Spears’ father, and working on a healthy, supportive father-daughter relationship.”

Montgomery denies Mr. Spears’ claim that she suggested the singer be placed under a psychiatric hold.

“Mr. Spears’ declaration misrepresents what Ms. Montgomery said to him in relation to a potential 5150 psychiatric hold for Ms. Spears,” the statement says. “At no time did Ms. Montgomery express to Mr. Spears that Ms. Spears would currently qualify for such a hold. The concern that Ms. Montgomery did raise to Mr. Spears during their telephone call is that forcing Ms. Spears to take the stand to testify or to have her evaluated would move the needle in the wrong direction for her mental health.”





Spears’ father also alleges that Montgomery acknowledged that “many of my daughter’s statements at the last hearing were not true and attributed her statements to the fact that my daughter is ‘mentally sick.’”

The hearing Spears’ father is referring to is when the superstar told the judge in mid-July that she wants to “press charges” for “conservatorship abuse.” She has made allegations of being controlled by her father to the point of not being able to choose what she wants to drink, not being able to drive in a car with her boyfriend and not being allowed to have another child or get married, as she claims her conservators will not allow her to remove her IUD birth control device. (In the past, attorneys for Mr. Spears have denied all wrongdoing.)

Spears’ father says that his “sole motivation has been his unconditional love for his daughter and a fierce desire to protect her from those trying to take advantage of her.”

Despite Spears’ father’s stating he is working in the best interest of his daughter, Montgomery appears to be in line with the pop star, who told Judge Brenda Penny earlier this summer that she wants to keep Montgomery on her case and wants her father removed and put in jail. Ms. Spears said that she wants Montgomery to help her acclimate back into the real world, and Montgomery has said that she is working towards the eventual goal of getting Spears out of her conservatorship.

Attorneys for Spears’ father continue to maintain his innocence and point the finger at Montgomery. The elder Spears had previously used this tactic, and Friday’s filing indicates a continuation of that same strategy. Following his daughter’s first explosive testimony in court on June 23 where she initially broke her silence with blistering accusations against her father, he had said that he has nothing to do with any personal or medical decisions, which he says are in Montgomery’s purview.

Today, Spears’ father says that Montgomery, along with his daughter’s former court-appointed attorney Samuel D. Ingham, who has since resigned, is the one who admitted the pop star to a facility in early 2019 and has “continued to have control of my daughter’s medical treatment and personal life ever since.”

Montgomery strongly denies this accusation, with her attorney telling Variety that she did not admit her to any facility, and she would not even have the power to make such a decision.

“As Case Manager, Ms. Montgomery worked under the sole direction and control of Jamie Spears,” Montgomery’s lawyer says in a statement. “She had no power or authority to place Britney Spears in any facility as a Case Manager — only Jamie Spears had that power in March 2019.”

The statement continues: “It is unequivocally not true that it was Ms. Montgomery and Sam Ingham ‘who admitted Ms. Spears to a facility in early 2019.’ In fact, that would have been impossible. Neither a Case Manager nor a Court Appointed Counsel could have had that power, either working alone or together. Only the Conservator of the Person would have had that power (with the Conservatee’s consent) – and, again, that was Jamie Spears in March 2019.”

Montgomery’s lawyer says that while she may have signed “routine paperwork” for the facility, she only did so “at the direction of Jamie Spears.” She says that the decision to place the singer in a facility in March 2019 was made by the singer’s treating psychiatrist at the time, Dr. Timothy Benson.

Montgomery has also appeared to align herself with the interests of Spears’ new lawyer, Mathew Rosengart. In a recent filing, Montgomery agreed with Rosengart in wanting to remove Mr. Spears from the conservatorship, and also claimed that Spears’ own doctors agree that he should be removed from the position. (Rosengart is currently working towards the removal and suspension of Spears’ father, having filed paperwork in a matter of weeks after he began working with the singer.)

In the new documents, filed by Spears’ father on Friday, he also takes aim at his daughter’s attorney and objects to moving the hearing regarding the petition to remove him from the conservatorship. Yesterday, Rosengart filed to speed up the hearing, stating it would be in the best interest of the conservatee. (As of now, the hearing is set for Sept. 29.)

“A conservatorship should be a last resort, designed to benefit the conservatee rather than a mechanism designed to serve as a tool for the enrichment of third parties,” Rosengart’s latest filing stated, once again, alleging that Spears’ father has dissipated her multi-million fortune. Yesterday’s documents said: “Mr. Spears has also enriched himself at the expense of his daughter, reaping millions of dollars from her services as a performer, in addition to paying himself $16,000 per month from Ms. Spears’ estate, $2,000 more than he has allotted to Ms. Spears, plus $2,000 per month for office expenses.”

Yesterday, Rosengart’s filing included an allegation that the elder Spears had opposed his daughter going on vacation to Maui, Hawaii. In today’s filing, Mr. Spears fights back, saying that Rosengart has made “unsubstantiated, vague accusations” and a “false statement” about the Hawaii trip.

Rosengart says that Spears’ father has exerted “absolutely microscopic control” over her life since her childhood and continues to do so today, as conservator of her estate. As an example, Rosengart claims that Spears’ father objected to his 39-year-old daughter take a vacation in Maui this past summer, but “ultimately relented.”

“Mr. Spears objected to his daughter’s wish in late July to take a short vacation, disapproving of the expenditure that would have come from his daughter’s own, hard-earned money,” Rosengart’s filing stated yesterday. “The mere objection to his adult daughter taking a brief, well-earned vacation at this point in her life, while other funds are lavishly expended, underscores why suspension, and ultimately removal, should not wait.”

Variety has reached out to Rosengart for comment regarding Mr. Spears’ new filing.


Why is he so obsessed with holding the conservatorship :side-eye:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom