VoR
Take it or leave it
I know, I was being facetious.
I know, I'm just chuckling at the idea of the CITY of BATLEY.
I know, I was being facetious.
Southend is going to be made a city as a tribute
They have the world's longest pier. Yeah. A victorian novelty.At least Colchester has a castle and a prestigious Roman history. What does Southend have? A WETHERSPOONS?
Southend is going to be made a city as a tribute
Utterly bizarre. City status lasts for centuries.
I don’t think I understand ANY of itOh for fuck's sake We really do need some sort of NFT/crypto bullshit thread, because there's so much absolute nonsense associated with it all.
To be eligible for a whole life order, the killer has to be aged 21 or over and the seriousness of the offence is considered to be 'exceptionally high'. Things like the murder of two or more people with a substantial degree of planning, the killing of a child with a sexual motive, murder for political purposes and murders by an offender who has already been convicted of murder in the past will lead to a case falling into that category. The killers of Jo Cox and David Amess are likely to have been considered exceptionally serious because they were committed to advance a political cause. I'm not sure about Sarah Everard's killer, but I would guess he got a whole life order because he was in a position of trust as a serving police officer. The killing of Sabina Nessa, whilst appalling, must not have been considered to have any of the specific aggravating factors to justify a whole life order.Not sure if this is the right thread or not but...
I just read that David's killer has (rightfully)been given a whole life sentence. Others that have recieved a whole life sentence are the murderers of Jo Cox and Sarah Everard.
Last week I was reading about the killer of Sabrina Nessa, he got a life sentence (minimum 36 years). Not a whole life sentence.
So what makes one murderer get a whole life and others just life?
I think this is exactly it, there is a degree of subjectivity to it in absence of a specific rubric. It seems to be multiple killings, those who abused trust (police etc.), and political / terrorist killings are likely to attract a whole life tariff.To be eligible for a whole life order, the killer has to be aged 21 or over and the seriousness of the offence is considered to be 'exceptionally high'. Things like the murder of two or more people with a substantial degree of planning, the killing of a child with a sexual motive, murder for political purposes and murders by an offender who has already been convicted of murder in the past will lead to a case falling into that category. The killers of Jo Cox and David Amess are likely to have been considered exceptionally serious because they were committed to advance a political cause. I'm not sure about Sarah Everard's killer, but I would guess he got a whole life order because he was in a position of trust as a serving police officer. The killing of Sabina Nessa, whilst appalling, must not have been considered to have any of the specific aggravating factors to justify a whole life order.