GinAg (39)
User
- Pronouns
- He/Him
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2009
- Messages
- 229,343
Depp is winning so far.
Last edited:
Losing.Herd is winning so far.
I meant exactly that. YesLosing.
That is far more than I was expecting. Hope he donates it all to the charities she said she’d donate to but didn’t.
Not being able to produce evidence doesn’t negate somebody being a victim of domestic abuse. I really feel that is very important to keep hold of, regardless of the outcome of a defamation case.There was far too much evidence against her as an abuser and not the abused. She admitted to far too much on the stand too that was pretty definitive.
The EVIDENCE AGAINST HER that SHE abused HIM.Not being able to produce evidence doesn’t negate somebody being a victim of domestic abuse. I really feel that is very important to keep hold of, regardless of the outcome of a defamation case.
Why are you getting so mad?The EVIDENCE AGAINST HER that SHE abused HIM.
Stick to the facts of THIS case though
In a similar vein, and as you say, if you’re interested in looking beyond or behind this legal case, this is a good readI'm far more interested in that post than this case specifically.
Then that post shouldn’t be calling AH a survivor. She should just speak generally without bringing this case in to it.I'm far more interested in that post than this case specifically.
The Guardian and The Independent have actually been the BIGGEST perpetrators of spreading untruths about this case. I’ve read so many opinion pieces just flagrantly ignoring all of the evidence against her.In a similar vein, and as you say, if you’re interested in looking beyond or behind this legal case, this is a good read
Was it really asking too much for Amber Heard to be listened to without prejudice? | Gaby Hinsliff
Johnny Depp’s legal team left the jury with a stark choice: believe it all, or believe nothing. Life’s not that simple, says Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliffwww.theguardian.com
It's questioning why other survivors support Johnny Depp. It's perfectly valid.Then that post shouldn’t be calling AH a survivor. She should just speak generally without bringing this case in to it.
An opinion piece is exactly what it is though. An opinion.The Guardian and The Independent have actually been the BIGGEST perpetrators of spreading untruths about this case. I’ve read so many opinion pieces just flagrantly ignoring all of the evidence against her.
That piece isn’t about ‘untruths’ but the binary choice posited (in the author’s opinion) in this case and how that often isn’t reality (which I don’t myself think is an unreasonable position to take at all - it was clearly a very complicated situation)The Guardian and The Independent have actually been the BIGGEST perpetrators of spreading untruths about this case. I’ve read so many opinion pieces just flagrantly ignoring all of the evidence against her.
Which is ALL the fucking Guardian does these days I swear. They’ve replaced journalists with click-bait columnists.An opinion piece is exactly what it is though. An opinion.
“Other” survivors? That’s assuming Heard is one. My flatmate is a survivor of DV and she was seriously triggered watching the testimonies. If Heard was a man none of these conversations would be happening. Survivors are mostly relating to Depp. I’ve had it explained to me so many times how her actions towards him were exactly what was done towards them.It's questioning why other survivors support Johnny Depp. It's perfectly valid.
All right then, forget 'other' - that's MY word. The article refers to why survivors are supporting him.“Other” survivors? That’s assuming Heard is one. My flatmate is a survivor of DV and she was seriously triggered watching the testimonies. If Heard was a man none of these conversations would be happening. Survivors are mostly relating to Depp. I’ve had it explained to me so many times how her actions towards him were exactly what was done towards them.