Well this was decent - I honestly don’t understand why some people went to see this, as there’s nothing they wouldn’t have experienced in the first film. What did people expect? I mean it’s established that they can communicate with animals, so why wouldn’t the whale? There was nothing that didn’t make sense in-universe.
That said, I don’t think of myself as an Avatar stan (despite finding out I gave it a 10, maybe that was out of spite). This gave me basically everything the first movie did, no more, no less.
Looked amazing, and I was right to trust Cameron with his action sequences, those felt more varied than the climax of the last movie.
Was the script full of cliches? Yes. Was the motivation of the baddie justified? At the start maybe, but the big Edie Falco side of it basically disappeared in favour of revenge battles. I don’t really get the take that they’re setting up the baddie (still can’t remember his name) as some central character, there was nothing about him except aggro American army cliches.
I got WHY the subplots about teen bullying and whatever were in there, I just think the whole thing could’ve been wrapped up half an hour earlier with a stronger script.
I agree basically with everything
@Phoenix and
@Slave said. It was a well-put together piece, there were flaws, not enough to sink the whole thing, and I’ll both watch the sequels and probably not need to watch this one again. It didn’t feel like a middle film, which these days is a minor miracle, especially following the biggest movie of all time (losing to Endgame on penalties notwithstanding)
Also wtf was the point of the marine biologist