Napoleon (Ridley Scott)
- Thread starter Phoenix
- Start date
Not me seeing that title and thinking it was the Gladiator sequel
Same thing, but with hats.
Looks epically huge, but Phoenix is not someone I ever clamour to watch on screen. Vanessa Kirby seems alright.
Phoenix
I’m the hostess of the dinner
- Pronouns
- He/Him
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2005
- Messages
- 32,278
Ellie
Super talented triple threat
I walked through the set of this on my way to work by accident last year
ButterTart
Succulent Chinese meal
The number of motorised vehicles in this photo makes me question the historical accuracy of this film.
VoR
Take it or leave it
Well this was sadly yet another listlessly directed Ridley Scott movie with no particular narrative thrust or point of view. It felt like a filmed wikipedia entry of key events in Napoleon's life, but it never really got under the skin of the man or even sufficiently explained his popularity or why he was able to rise to power.
The battle scenes were decent enough and it had some decent moments (the burning of Moscow was nice and eery, and the relationship with Vanessa Kirby was intriguing, if a bit underdeveloped). But none of it felt like it really amounted to anything.
The battle scenes were decent enough and it had some decent moments (the burning of Moscow was nice and eery, and the relationship with Vanessa Kirby was intriguing, if a bit underdeveloped). But none of it felt like it really amounted to anything.
VoR
Take it or leave it
There's a SIX HOUR CUT?! 
VoR
Take it or leave it
To be fair it did feel like it was cramming too much in. One other complaint I had is that it covered about 30 years of history and yet neither Joaquin Phoenix nor Vanessa Kirby appeared to age a day. It would have benefited from just focusing on one part of his life/career IMO.
But ultimately yes, the impression I got from this and Gucci (less so the Last Duel, which was also overlong but worked a lot better due to the three-part format) is of a director who's just running out of fumes. It tracks, he's 85 years old! But he's clearly not a good enough judge of his own material to trim the fat, but also too powerful for anybody else to step in and demand changes. The man is in desperate need of a judicious editor.
I liked Killers of the Flower Moon a lot more, but I get a similar feeling from Scorcese and his recent spate of four hour epics.
But ultimately yes, the impression I got from this and Gucci (less so the Last Duel, which was also overlong but worked a lot better due to the three-part format) is of a director who's just running out of fumes. It tracks, he's 85 years old! But he's clearly not a good enough judge of his own material to trim the fat, but also too powerful for anybody else to step in and demand changes. The man is in desperate need of a judicious editor.
I liked Killers of the Flower Moon a lot more, but I get a similar feeling from Scorcese and his recent spate of four hour epics.
