My mental guidelines are as follows:
- Ukraine are probably going to get over 300 points from the televote. If that doesn't happen, someone else has probably won (unless Ukraine do really well with the juries, which I don't think will happen but you never know).
- SO, something else with public appeal needs to do really well with the juries. Over 300 points or as close to 300 points from the juries, ideally.
- If something with public appeal gets over 300 points from the juries while Ukraine gets under 150 (ideally under 100), then it has probably won.
- Norway will probably come top 3 on the televote along with Ukraine, taking up a lot of televote points between them. This probably makes it important that whatever wins the jury vote/doesn't win the jury vote but gets a similar number of points to the jury winner is the other one of that top three, if it's going to be capable of winning. The jury winner probably needs more than 200 from the public in order to win.
- I suspect the most likely outcome is that the jury winner gets 250-300 jury points, and Ukraine gets 100-150 jury points. At that point it'd be really open going into the public vote, and Ukraine falling shorter than expected (only getting 250 or so public votes for example) would probably make all the difference.
- I suspect (in no particular order) Sweden, the UK, Italy and Poland are the only tracks there that could make it to around the 300 mark from the juries and get over 200 from the public.