in Taylor-context, we brush past just how much album sales have declined since No Strings Attached, isn't it like a -85% decline since 2000? surely this release and hype could have easily crossed 4m first week in the US two decades ago.
her power is truly unprecedented.
That's funny because those were my favourites from side 2 on first listen. They're very evermoreit takes a serious dip with I Hate It Here, the Kim song and the especially wretched I Look In People's Windows.
Multiple vinyl colours is an epidemic - Charli XCX is up to 9 variants for her upcoming album available for pre-order including 4 picture discs that are already sold out. Billie Eilish is doing 8 vinyl variants and has a piece on her website with the full disclosure. As such, Swift's 5 looks positively restrained. However, what is NOT normal is this business of changing one song on 3 of the 5 pressings. Olivia Rodrigo added a different bonus track to each of the 4 variants she sold on her website but didn't tell anyone that she's done so in advance - it was a genuine easter egg. However, once this got out, sales shot up and now she's releasing an extended LP with all 4 of those songs and...of course...one other. It feels like an escalation of something that was already becoming disquieting.Regarding comparing sales (you can't) and multi-formatting, I get that she's far from the only one who does it, but for me there is a difference to just releasing different formats, artwork, coloured vinyl etc, and then purposely choosing to release different formats including different tracks, so the only way you can physically own all the music is to buy multiple copies. I appreciate that's only really an extension of a theme, but it sits uncomfortably with me.
Is that a commonplace thing across big acts now, or just a Taylor Swift thing?
I don't actually know how big a Taylor Swift thing it is. I've just read a lot of GRIPING on social media.
Multiple vinyl colours is an epidemic - Charli XCX is up to 9 variants for her upcoming album available for pre-order including 4 picture discs that are already sold out. Billie Eilish is doing 8 vinyl variants and has a piece on her website with the full disclosure. As such, Swift's 5 looks positively restrained. However, what is NOT normal is this business of changing one song on 3 of the 5 pressings. Olivia Rodrigo added a different bonus track to each of the 4 variants she sold on her website but didn't tell anyone that she's done so in advance - it was a genuine easter egg. However, once this got out, sales shot up and now she's releasing an extended LP with all 4 of those songs and...of course...one other. It feels like an escalation of something that was already becoming disquieting.
As I've said before, it's the singles market of the 80s and 90s now added to albums. I bought 4 formats of Blur's "Sunday Sunday" in 1993 to get all 8 b-sides but did so at a cost of £6.96. "Everyone" was doing it then too - singles were almost always multiformatted with remixes, live tracks etc, demos and the odd actual song that was worth having. So here was are 30 years later; physical singles are dead and the same tactics are being employed on albums. Double albums at that. I'm not keen.
Don’t get me
Billie Eilish?
Wasn’t she moaning about multi formatting and artists not being sustainable the other day?
Made with a sustainable vinyl alternative and no shrink wrap so it is all ok apparently.
Just listened to track 16.getting stronger/more interesting as it goes on
I just did! (Scooter's version)Then listen to Out Of The Woods!!